Satisfaction and Usability of Moodle in a Virtual Biochemistry Scientific Event

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70577/rps.v4i2.203

Keywords:

Online learning, Moodle, usability, user satisfaction, virtual scientific events.

Abstract

The accelerated transition toward virtual environments highlighted challenges in the usability and accessibility of LMS platforms in scientific events, particularly associated with connectivity limitations and inflexible instructional design; in this context, the study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction and usability of Moodle in the V Virtual Biochemistry Meeting. A mixed-methods methodology, of a descriptive and cross-sectional type, was applied through a survey of 147 participants (a 59% response rate), analyzing quantitative data with descriptive statistics and qualitative data through thematic analysis. The results evidenced a high rating for the event, with 93.2% qualifying it as excellent, 87.1% highlighting content quality, and 79.6% its relevance; however, 33.3% reported technical difficulties, mainly due to connectivity, and 19.7% rated the experience as fair. Despite these limitations, 93.2% expressed the intention to participate again, demonstrating that the value of the content outweighs technical barriers; consequently, it is inferred that Moodle is effective for virtual scientific events, provided user experience is optimized and digital access conditions are taken into account.

References

Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309

Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 292–307. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.1.292

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Calle-Díaz, D. M., Porras-Cruz, F. L., & Santamaría-Freire, E. J. (2024). Modelo de aceptación tecnológica y la difusión de contenidos en estudiantes universitarios. MQRInvestigar, 8(4), 5685–5705. https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.8.4.2024.5685-5705

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

De la Cruz-Veliz, M. P., Quevedo-Álava, J. R., Bravo-Acosta, A. E., & Loor-Álvarez, M. P. (2025). Análisis de la brecha digital y su influencia en el acceso a la información educativa. Innova Science Journal, 3(2), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.63618/omd/isj/v3/n2/53

Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, Artículo 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5

Gibson, H., Illingworth, S., & Buiter, S. (2021). The future of conferences: Lessons from Europe’s largest online geoscience conference. Geoscience Communication, 4, 437–451. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-437-2021

Kraleva, R., Sabani, M., & Kralev, V. (2019). An analysis of some learning management systems. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(4), 1190-1198. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.9.4.8315

Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481

Regmi, K., & Jones, L. (2020). A systematic review of the factors—enablers and barriers—affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Medical Education, 20, Artículo 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6

Rivero Padrón, Y., Pastora Alejo, B., & Albuja Mariño, P. A. (2020). La plataforma Moodle como recurso tecnológico de complemento para la función docente universitaria. Conrado, 16(73), 237-243. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S199086442020000200237&lng=es&tlng=es

Rubinger, L., Gazendam, A., Ekhtiari, S., Nucci, N., Payne, A., Johal, H., Khanduja, V., & Bhandari, M. (2020). Maximizing virtual meetings and conferences: A review of best practices. International Orthopaedics, 44(8), 1461–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04615-9

Serna, R., & Alvites-Huamaní, C. (2021). Plataformas educativas: Herramientas digitales de mediación de aprendizajes en educación. Hamut'ay, 8(3), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.21503/hamu.v8i3.2347

Tao, Y., Steckel, D., Klemeš, J. J., & You, F. (2021). Trend towards virtual and hybrid conferences may be an effective climate change mitigation strategy. Nature Communications, 12, Artículo 7324. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27251-2

Tapia, C. (2022). Moodle: Un entorno virtual de aprendizaje que promueve el trabajo autónomo y el pensamiento crítico. Horizontes Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 6(26), 2238-2253. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v6i26.488

Valenti, A., Fortuna, G., Barillari, C., Cannone, E., Boccuni, V., & Iavicoli, S. (2021). The future of scientific conferences in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic: Critical analysis and future perspectives. Industrial Health, 59(5), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2021-0102

Vervoort, D., Dearani, J. A., Starnes, V. A., Thourani, V. H., & Nguyen, T. C. (2021). Brave new world: Virtual conferencing and surgical education in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 era. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 161(2), 748–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.144

Veytia Bucheli, M. G. (2024). Eventos científicos virtuales como espacios para la reflexión y el aprendizaje. Revista San Gregorio, (57), 254-265. https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i57.2500

Published

2026-04-07 — Updated on 2026-07-25

Versions

How to Cite

Rodríguez Hernández, R., & Alberteris Rodríguez, A. (2026). Satisfaction and Usability of Moodle in a Virtual Biochemistry Scientific Event. Journal Pulso Científico, 4(2), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.70577/rps.v4i2.203 (Original work published April 7, 2026)

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.